I will always suggest Article 5 by Kristen Simmons!

I don't think it is "necessary". I think it could be neat and bring you to some new blogs.

I think I could live on chips and salsa :)

The simple answer is no. You can't make anyone truly understand, they have to be willing to see them for themselves. That is true of almost everything in life. Just remember to keep being you :)

I have always wondered what others profiles looked like. I include blog links and overall rounded statistics tied with the time I have been blogging. I include a synopsis of my review policy as well to show where my reviews will posted.

Smooth Peanut Butter only. Ever. Period.

I was instantly thinking of casting Ridiculous! at memes. But I would think it would be acceptable. Wednesday for Wednesday?

I prefer Facebook and Twitter over google+. I understand it but I think the overall google interface is ugly since it has been updated.

Having people really appreciate my thoughts on the things that we read. Most of my friends don't read a lot (or at least what I read) and it is great to finally share that and know my thoughts are being considered :)

There are so many wonderful book bloggers that throwing yourself into the community to make new friends can be a little intimidating.

The short of it is yes, but I don't prefer them. The ones that I have read thus far haven't been my cup of tea so in the event that I accept the offer for the arc, I give the author the notice that I may or may not review it as it is also stated in my review policy.

I don't know if there is a right or wrong answer but my general format consists of about 4-5 paragraphs. With that said, between writing, proofing and formatting I would say 45-mins to an hour. On the lesser side when I know the things I want to say going in.

I don't think I do it successfully lol

The first REAL negative review I wrote I would say was XVI by Julia Karr. It was a hard experience to write it because (and even now I try to sugar coat it) just disliked it THAT BAD.

As a blogger, I am always looking at news releases through the blogosphere. But I also work in a library and my boss has started giving me the copies of a release magazine that she gets. And if they're authors I like, I follow them on twitter/facebook and keep up to date with what they're working on.

My Sister's Keeper, hands down. So incredibly touching.

I have not played 2.0 (or 4.0)but having played 3.0 and Pathfinder (as well as other systems produced from White Wold unlike Wizards) I think that D&D 3.0 is the most simplistic of them all. I find that it is laid out in an very easy-to-learn manner and most of the information is understandable at face value like skills, Melee Combat, Stats, etc.

I can't say the same for Pathfinder or Vampire the Masquerade or even some other edition character sheets for D&D where I get lost looking at the character sheet.

Adjusting my resume and filling out this application.

Base: Market and since I own Intrigue: Tribute.