<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>jjmccullough's Formspring answers</title>
    <description>jjmccullough's Formspring answers</description>
    <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough</link>
    <generator>http://www.formspring.me</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.formspring.me/profile/jjmccullough.rss" rel="self" />
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[If Quebec separated tomorrow, never mind how, what would exactly would change in Canada, and would the average Canadian feel any change in their daily life?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure life would really change much. There would be some degree of &quot;economic impact,&quot; probably in the form of &quot;economic uncertainty&quot; until all relevant trade, currency, migration, etc arrangements were settled between Canada and Quebec, but I&#039;m not sure  that&#039;s the kind of thing you can necessarily feel at the day-to-day living level. Clearly the most acute consequences would be for people living near the Quebec border, but I think their lives would probably continue as usual, for the most part. As I&#039;ve said before, Quebec separation does not mean a giant Berlin wall will be erected around the new country.<br />
<br />
In the long-term, Canada would likely become a much more conservative country, so I think the most vivid consequences would probably be political.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/295611596560933998</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/295611596560933998</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:34:56 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[What do you know of philosophy, outside of Ayn Rand? (This isn&#039;t asked in a mean or sneering way, though I&#039;m aware that&#039;s how it might read.)]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t even know Ayn Rand that well. I really haven&#039;t studied a lot of philosophy. I am broadly familiar with some of the big names and their general worldview, like, say Plato, Locke, Descartes, Nietzsche and so on, but not in any way I feel particularly proud of.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/295023707875718714</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/295023707875718714</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:38:53 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Did it occur to you to try and slip something to Colbert or show producers during the Vancouver taping about Filibuster Cartoons just to see if it got anywhere?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I guess I considered asking him to maybe autograph something, but I&#039;ve never really been into that kind of aggressive self-promotion.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/294380037770058383</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/294380037770058383</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:01:10 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[So is Rick Santorum like the most boring looking person to caricature?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[He is, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve noticed that I&#039;m not very good at drawing him.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642557672398283</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642557672398283</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:10:41 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[&quot;Freak race of giant-handed Italians&quot; is a great phrase. I know you have to notice things and exaggerate them to do proper caricature to make people distinct. I&#039;ve never noticed: Does he actually have giant hands or is it something you said for humor?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[He has this speech he gives a lot where he talks about his immigrant grandfather, and how he had huge hands from working in the mines or whatever. &quot;I just couldn&#039;t stop looking... at those giant hands!&quot; he says.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642465540312411</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642465540312411</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:10:19 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Why oh why is Ron Paul a blender? (by JDMussel)]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[Cause it makes no sense. Much like him.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642014971410147</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/293642014971410147</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:08:31 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[From 2001 to 2005, the last king of Bulgaria, who&#039;s monarchy was overthrown in 1946, served as Bulgaria&#039;s Prime Minister.  Has this situation ever happened anywhere else?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[The example that comes to mind is Cambodia, which constantly went back and forth from being a monarchy to being a republic in the decades between the 1960s and 1990s. Norodom Sihanouk, the famously long-reigning Cambodian ruler, was sometimes king and sometimes president at various times during the era.<br />
<br />
I believe in Africa there has been a president or two who was a former king of some abolished tribal monarchy, but that might not &quot;count&quot; in the same way.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292560921404902855</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292560921404902855</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:32:39 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Are there many British Imperialism apologists in Canada? I’ve noticed a rise in “Romanizing” by younger Brits, that the empire was a force that did bad things, but in total left behind more good for the colonized people (mainly India).]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I think that&#039;s a fairly common perspective among Anglo conservatives of all sorts. in America, you see this with some of the more intelectual conservatives who are skeptical of Obama&#039;s father, who was of course very active in anti-colonialist politics in Kenya. They see Obama Sr. as a guy very much on the &quot;wrong side of history,&quot; and a man who has probably tainted the President with beliefs that are basically anti-western and anti-civilization.<br />
<br />
It&#039;s not necessarily a racist thing, but I think a lot of Anglo-American conservatives assume that the plague of bad government in places like Africa and the Middle East is in large part due to the imperial powers leaving too early, and not finishing the civilizing job they began. As opposed to, say, India, where they did, and would be viewed as more of a success story as a result. The whole neo-con &quot;remake the Middle East&quot; has a strong theme of imperial apologism inherent in it.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292558941328516296</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292558941328516296</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:24:47 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[What kinds of relations might Presidents Clinton, Bush 43, and Obama have had with the Soviet Union, had it continued to this day?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a very interesting question. I think the mainstream perspective is that the Soviet Union probably would have greatly moderated in the 1990s, and become a country sort of like China, with a Communist government that was no longer nearly as viciously totalitarian nor dogmatically Marxist — in other words, a sort of permanent perestroika / glasnost regime. I think Clinton would have been the president to usher in a formal era of fully normalized, peaceful relations, and declared the Cold War to be officially over, or something like that. <br />
<br />
Under George W. Bush and Obama I imagine things would have gone more or less the same as they have in the real world, assuming Putin became head of the USSR. Which is to say, worsening relations and fear of a Russian reemergence as a troublemaking world power. I guess the Republicans would probably use this as a much bigger talking point than they do now, though. Soviet-Islamic relations would probably be viewed with more suspicion and paranoia, and who knows, maybe the whole War on Terror would be viewed through some sort of neo-Cold War paradigm.<br />
<br />
It&#039;s a hard question to answer, of course, because so much really depends on what kind of people would be leading the USSR. I do think overall, however, that the world would be a very similar place. I&#039;ve been reading more stuff from the 1980s recently and even the analysts who were assuming the USSR would survive for many decades to come were all generally of the opinion that the country would basically never be the same again thanks to Gorbachev.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292556726090082614</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/292556726090082614</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:15:58 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[If the Confederate States of America had won the American Civil War, would it still exist today, and what kind of nation would it be?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I think it probably would. Canada was founded around the same time, and if it could survive, why not a third Anglo-American nation?<br />
<br />
I imagine they would have kept slavery until the early 20th century, and then instituted some manner of apartheid system to legally inshrine a permanent racial hierarchy. They might have been super-eager participants in both world wars (due to what I assume would be strengthened British ties) or they might be strong isolationists. During the Cold War they would be anti-Communist, but also an unpopular and isolated from other western democracies, and would probably build their own nuclear weapon. I could see full US-CSA relations not formally resuming until the 1950s or so.<br />
<br />
Cut off from the US, the CSA would probably have a significantly smaller population than the modern south and be fairly backwards and poor, with an economy kept overly reliant on agriculture and industry as a result of the prolonged presence of slavery and cheap black labour. Canada and the US would probably be much closer to each other than they even are now. US politics would be significantly more left-wing and European, and the imagined differences between Canada and the US would be far slighter due to the absence of a conservative south. <br />
<br />
A very interesting thought experiment.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/290734791312027734</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/290734791312027734</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:36:15 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[A frequent complaint of yours seems to be that a given act of protest/activisim is poorly defined or pointless. What are the well-defined protests/activist movements that you are judging them against?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I think there are lots of examples. Women&#039;s suffrage was an effective protest movement. So was the drive for civil rights. The Tea Party is a pretty good modern example. <br />
<br />
In all cases, however, what made these movements successful was that they had multiple wings; there was a &quot;street marching&quot; wing, but also a political wing, a media wing, a social wing, etc. I think a lot of today&#039;s professed protest movements are very lazy and unserious for the simple reason that they&#039;re not interested in engaging in activism on the required multiple levels. More often than not, today&#039;s protestors just want to complain, as opposed to actually do the hard work that&#039;s required to implement their agenda.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/288947760332291774</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/288947760332291774</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:15:14 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Do you regret &quot;sleeves rolled&quot; during that SunNews interview?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s actually a weird &quot;fashionable&quot; shirt where the sleeves are auto-rolled. So I had no choice. Apologies to anyone who doesn&#039;t understand this obscure reference.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/288945482460301706</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/288945482460301706</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:06:11 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[So how does it feel to have won against Wikipedia if only for a day?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[It was glorious.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/285309290770597434</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/285309290770597434</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:17:15 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Did the makers of &quot;The Iron Lady&quot; seek to make an accurate biopic of Margret Thatcher, or did they embark on a &quot;let&#039;s make Torries look crazy&quot; exercise?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really not a political movie at all. It&#039;s a movie about an old woman with dementia who happened to be a Conservative politician in happier times. That&#039;s the perspective the film is made from, and why it&#039;s so awful.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/285308657699137734</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/285308657699137734</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:14:44 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Do the recent reforms in Myanmar (Burma) surprise you at all?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I guess a bit. But I think it&#039;s still too early to judge.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555731980521279</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555731980521279</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:22:53 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Would Mr. Savage&#039;s marriage issued be resolved is Mr. Savage maned up and became a Canadian citizen already?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[But then what would he have to complain about?]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555601676082834</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555601676082834</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:22:22 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Who are you? Why are you following me? (by krisstraub)]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I am J.J. We used to cohabit the PVPforums back in the day, remember that? I also have vague memories of chatting with you on AIM for a while, before you were such a big shot. I don&#039;t really read any of your comics, but I&#039;m interested in you as a person, and your opinions on various things. Truth be told, Formspring is really the main way I engage with you.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555305889572694</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284555305889572694</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:11 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Are you ever told &quot;I usually don&#039;t read political cartoons, but...?&quot;]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[Oh god yes, all the time. I actually hate it when people say that, because it just makes me further depressed that this is the kind of cartooning I&#039;ve chosen to do. A genre that everyone hates.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284554795904145933</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284554795904145933</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:19:10 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Wait, CKA didn&#039;t consult its users before blacking out against SOPA? Doesn&#039;t that seem a little.... over-reaching in censoring content?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I get a good deal from their hosting services. A day offline was a small price to pay. Literally!]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284554450993940508</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/284554450993940508</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:17:47 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
            <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Gov. Perry has suggested a part-time Congress in the USA, where each term would have a few months to a year off.  Would a rule banning people from consecutive terms, but unlimited non-consecutive terms, be a more viable option?]]></title>
            <description><![CDATA[I think a part-time Congress is a terrible idea. It just consolidates more power in the hands of the party leaders and the executive branch, and makes Congress into this kind of cameo appearance. <br />
<br />
I think the non-con term idea is pretty good. Sometimes it requires a break before you know if you really want to continue or not.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/283655801413841159</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.formspring.me/jjmccullough/q/283655801413841159</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:46:53 -0500</pubDate>
            <dc:creator>jjmccullough</dc:creator>            
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
