-
-
Of course not. The man's a tactical genius. He gave me a pillow.
My throat kind of hurts though. :-) -
-
Probably ninjas but pirates would have more fun!
-
Depends on the person. I don't believe in dating just to date.
-
Yes! In fact, I'll do one tonight! (I needed a blog post!)
-
I think Sandy will do relatively well as none of these heroes are quite as dumb as the Golden Age Sandman.
Not being an adult, able to swim or fly might be a minor obstacle, but I think he can probably find a way around it. :-) -
Tim could probably keep him alive. Steph was more of a lovable screw-up though. Not that she can't learn, but the learning curve's steep when your mentor is an idiot.
Jason's hot tempered enough to probably accidently bring about Wes's death in a fit of pique. Damien would totally kill him himself. -
Depends on the type of zombie really. The whole reason being dead nullifies most contracts is because a) dead can't consent and thus can't enter INTO contracts and b) we tend to dislike things that burden heirs and other folk who weren't the ones to initially agree to such things.
So provided that zombies CAN consent (which'll depend on the version) and the zombie is still in control of its own property and the like, I'd argue his contract rights would still stand.
But even without contract rights, I'd say he still has the same rights and such at least as children and incompetent people. -
Depends on which Robin?
But if we are talking Golden Age, Batman doesn't know what to do with himself when he has a sidekick fully capable of rescuing HIMSELF from most danger.
Meanwhile, Wes and Robin die. It's very sad. :-P -
Depends on the incarnation? My favorite Legion was post-Zero Hour so it wasn't really a factor there.
In general though, it seems cute enough from what I saw. Neither are really my favorite Legionnaires, but I don't really dislike them, and I only really tend to have problems with 'ships if I strongly dislike one or think the relationship seems really REALLY unhealthy.
I kind of dig the her-brawn, to his-brain kinda thing, too. :-) -
Nick Fury plays Princess Maker. We should never ask why.
-
Hmm, I'd probably want teleportation. Because who wouldn't want to go anywhere you want in a flash. Also, I'm lazy. I'd like to think I'd be a hero, but I'd probably a petty villain. I'm like that.
I can't really think of any clever hero/villain name, but I'm sure I'd think of something obnoxious. -
I would totally buy that comic. But if Reed Richards doesn't grow a handlebar mustache, I will feel cheated.
-
Well, legally, I'd say the clones are definitely people and should have their rights protected and so on.
In the case of unintentional genetic donors like Spider-Man, Jean Grey and so on, I don't think they should be sued for paternity though since they did not take willing part in the conception/creation. (Debatably wouldn't the clones be more like genetically siblings? Unless it uses DNA from more than one person, i.e. Gambit in The End, but in that case it's more of a test-tube baby.)
The doctors should totally get a paternity suit though. And I think there should be statutes criminalizing the use of DNA from unwilling/unwitting donors, as while it's not RAPE, it's still a bit beyond standard larceny, IMO. -
Hmm, probably Rena Sofer's character on NCIS, with the caveat that I only saw her first episode and she might have become incompetent or evil since.
It was so refreshing to see a lawyer portrayed as competent, who understood the laws, and was able to call the team on their over-steps. If she's as capable in the field of civil litigation, she's gold.
In real life, it is much better to have a competent opposing attorney rather than an incompetent one. -
Probably gold. Because it never came out even close to what it was advertised as. It always came out this weird greenish color to me. All the metallic crayons kind of sucked, so I'm perversely fond of them.
-
Just one? Honestly, it depends on whatever I'm into at the time. My loves cycle in importance. If I'm into Green Lantern, it might be that arc of GLC with Guy and the butterfly woman, or the Christmas issue of Warrior.
If I'm into X-Men at the time, it might be one of the Inferno issues where Sinister's a bit creepy, or Utopia/Nation X for Scott's sheer machiavellian awesome, or Children of the Atom, because implausibilities inside (like Hank, Bobby and Scott being briefly at the same school), it's still the most coherent attempt to address the foundation of the X-Men pre-issue #1.
If I'm into JSA, then maybe Stealing Thunder or the arc with Johnny Sorrow and the Injustice society whose name I can't recall at the moment from the mid teens of the 2000 JSA run.
All I know is I tend to prefer storyarcs to single issues. And it's very mood specific. -
Is it really recent? I mean the whole biting-as-metaphor-for-sex is pretty old, isn't it? Forever Knight was almost 20 years ago. And Interview with a Vampire was published in 1976. And vampires in romance novels aren't particularly new either (I remember reading my mom's Linda Lael Miller vampire romance books at age 12 or so. Wouldn't recommend them. But not because of the vampire part.)
I think it's a fairly common fantasy though: dangerous, seductive, the thrill of being pursued (fantasy, not reality, naturally.) and being the girl who can make the bad boy want to change. It's probably no more or less healthy than most other fantasies...as long as the reader has a clear idea of the difference between fantasy and reality of course. -
Off the top of my head, I can't think of one. I usually do the mass social events in groups of friends, where when I date, we usually stay in and play video games. I'm an awful girlfriend.
-
Yes and no. I think that gender, like any factor of identity, will influence the pool of experiences a writer draws from to write comics. I don't think it's the be-all and end-all factor, but diversity enriches art.
-
