22 years old.

It really depends on the consequences of said betrayal. Is the betrayal just a harmless breach of trust or an act that could have a very real negative impact on said person? I might betray someone if the benefit to myself is sufficiently high *and* the negative consequences on that person are sufficiently low. That said, I've always been more of a power/fame whore than a money whore; I'm no consumerist scum. All things being equal, I'm more likely to betray someone for power than for money.

Your identity is very obvious. And I'll never quit. :D

7.5 cm vs. 15 cm

Take your pick:

1) 2001: made a girl cry by calling her an airport (lesson: grow bigger boobs).

2) 2005: Taped girls changing clothes in hostel (still have the video). Took upskirt pictures with my handphone (still have the pictures). Wolf-whistled at/used corny pick-up lines on girls with big boobs a million times.

3) 2005: Kept random panties I found in the laundry (still have them).

4) 2008: Boob-grabbed a drunk friend.

5) 2009: Cheated on my ex-girlfriend, not even sure how many times.

Well, what about daily? Since whatever those activities are, they're called "daily activities"? Idiot.

No, because I've outgrown relationships. Nah, the truth is I'm currently pursuing something, in addition to the major distraction called "school", that would take up most of my time (think 40 hours a week or more, not that I plan for it to be that long) and money too (in the sense that I cannot be so liberal in spending it, to make up somewhat for the opportunity costs incurred). The only thing worse than a guy who's cash-strapped is a guy who's *also* time-strapped; no girl would sign up for that shit. I consider myself to be a decent human being, but there's no way I can compete with dudes driving fast cars, getting straight As in school/working in some fancy uptown law firm, and still have all the free time in the world to charm a woman. So, yeah, I'm not even looking, because chances are no such woman exists.

I would do anything for a free lunch, but your identity is beyond me; I don't even have a guess. Tell me.

I experiment with my cash a lot (I've done things ranging from forex and unit trusts to stocks, business investment, and even domain names), but most of my capital gains have come from one particular stock, to which I periodically add cash, either by liquidating my other existing investments or saving. I save a lot of money each month, so that I will have a meaningful amount of cash ready for investment when/if the opportunity arrives.

I have quite a hell a lot of money now (based on today's closing price), which I plan to use as oxygen while I try to create a scalable, successful company, after graduation. If my company achieves profitability earlier than expected, I will buy my first piece of real estate with the cash. If my company turns out to be a total flop, I'll see how long that money can last me before I get a real job to build up my savings again (this is where my law degree, or limited programming experience, comes in), then try to build a company all over again.

I'll consider it. I don't have the money yet, but soon. Thanks for your thought.

I think I know who you are. Anyway, I don't mind looking older than I am. In fact, it helps for me to look old now, because people just take me more seriously. No one likes to deal with a kid. Long hair has its problems, but it's so far so good. I don't think there is going to be another time in my life where I get to experiment with hairstyles, so I'm sticking to long hair for now, or at the very least maintain it properly.

Thanks for your hatred. Unfortunately, short hair is a nightmare to maintain; I would have to keep it short and style it with wax/whatever. With long hair, all I need is a rubberband. I'm considering seriously not shaving my face too. Save time and money. I'm also currently experimenting if I can still attract girls looking like a bum.

This question is not really relevant to me; I'm a dude, and I have no one that I need to impress. Contrast my situation to a girl who has nothing to offer but her looks (which really only matter if she pairs that up with sex), and, even then, her looks fade over time. It's people like that whose physical appearance needs to be in tip-top condition, not me. If I am financially poor, intellectually stupid, or generally seen as a loser, then I would have some real problems. On those yardsticks, I'm at least 3 to 5 times ahead of my peers, and I'm not even joking.

That said, to answer your question, no. I'm not fat, and I'm definitely not ugly. Looks are always a means to something; on its own, it has little practical value. Looks are virtually useless to a guy who has any semblance of talent. In other words, looks are crutches, not assets. It is what you try to exploit when you have nothing else to offer.

Looking good is an item way down on my priority list, nudged somewhere between cutting my toe nails and folding my blanket every morning. In fact, I pity the people who *have* to care about their looks. It must be tiring and constantly worrying to have people judging you left, right, and centre, and having your tender, delicate feelings hurt. These people cannot stop caring about looks, because without their looks, they are worthless, of no utility to anything or anyone.

If you want to discuss this further, we can have a lunch meeting. Oh wait, you're not coming? What's that? A bad hair day, a pimple, or you "feel fat"? Get moving, you're late for your manicure appointment. Don't forget to apply your aloe vera face mask too, followed by your exfoliator. Your skin needs to "breathe". Pfttt.

On the contrary, I've never been hairier in my entire life. It's unlikely that I'm balding; I'm only starting to grow my armpit hair. Hair loss is the least of my worries.

What are you, a glue freak? If you know me decently well, you would expect that the answer is no, because 1) glue is expensive, and 2) introducing glue into transactional activities can be time-consuming. I don't waste money and time for no clear benefit in return.

What I know is that glue starts to stick to the bottle once you have air. The best I can tell you is that there is a correlation between having air and glue sticking to the bottle. Ask this question to a scientist who memorize facts for a living, not me.

I'm pretty damn smart, if you ask me (big surprise), so my answer is something like 9++ out of 10. I say that because, whatever I want, 1) I know what it is, 2) I know how to get it, and 3) I often do get it. Money? Check -- I have enough money right now to buy real estate in cash if I wanted to (but that would be financially foolish; look at the ROI of real estate). Good grades? Check -- I have nothing to prove in that department anymore, I'm sick of getting insanely-good grades. Respect from peers? Check -- I can't name anyone who honestly thinks that I'm an idiot or a loser. Skills? Check -- I have learnt shit that I care about (e.g. gymnastics, musical instruments, programming) and honed said abilities all by myself to a respectable level. Girls? Check -- this is too easy, *even* when you're me (I look like a caveman and smell like sweaty balls). Love? Check -- I try to treat my family well, because they're the only ones who really matter anyway (think about it), and they treat me well as well. Yes, I am bragging now; get the fuck out of here for asking a patently obvious question.

Easy. 166 cm, or 5' 5".

Gay people are cool; I have nothing against them. If anything, I have something against people who have something against them. I may have the tendency of not being politically-correct when I refer to them (e.g. calling them faggots), but it's all in good spirit and I only say it for comedic effect. I find that many guys are "hot", but that doesn't mean that I want to rip their clothes off of their bodies and lick off hot cream sprayed on their nipples. Seldom do I envy them too. My feelings are always more like: "You're hot, so good for you and I'm happy for you".

What do you mean by "previously attained"? Doesn't that imply that I had to expend some effort in order to acquire "pubic hairs [sic]", as opposed to getting them naturally? This is quite an easy question, as the number of people who have seen a pubic hair of mine, still attached to my body, is very, very small. Out of that segment of people, the percentage who takes any interest whatsoever in greasy, coarse keratin strands sprouting out from my nether regions is even smaller (a pubic hair away from zero, no pun intended). The answer is, quite simply, no. This is not a stupid question by the way. To quote my junior college history teacher: "The only stupid question there is is an unasked one". But fuck her, she hated me because of a personality clash, and I hated her because of her dull incompetence.

Well, okay. Whether emotions are good or not depends on the relationship between emotions and people. If people control and use their emotions to their advantage, like Oprah, it's a good thing. If people are helplessly being controlled by their emotions to their disadvantage, it's a bad thing. Women are very, very bad at taking ownership of their emotions.