-
-
I refuse to answer any question not written in English.
-
-
-
Yes. But there is no such thing as too much caramel.
-
-
-
Time does not exist as a physically manifested entity in an objective context. Please rephrase the question.
You may find this link useful: http://www.ool.co.uk/subject/gcse-english/ -
Yeah i'm just awesome.
As point of fact though, and without getting too overtly womens-lib on the topic - but you wont find many men as clever as me either!
My only downfall is a complete absense of modesty from my character, but when you are as brilliant as I am who needs modesty :P -
Your best bet is probably to veer away from balancing the cars altogether, and go for a success ballast system instead. Just slap a 2 or 3% restriction on the FXO to begin with to get it "more or less" in the same ball park as the RB4 and XRT, and go from there.
-
The bottom line is that the FXO will always be a more controllable car. The same would be true if it wasnt a simulator too - because front wheel drive is more forgiving and that's why most road cars are front wheel drive. In a simulated environment rear wheel drive is a little harder to control because you lack the feeling of mommentum which is where part of the advantage of rear wheel drive comes from. In short, you wont ballane the handling, only the overall lap time - and because they are different cars you wont balance them for all tracks.
-
It really does depend on the circuit. In race trim the RB4 is usually quicker than an XRT around a short track, but is nigh on impossible to overtake with. FXO needs an engine restriction whatever the track. On longer races the XRT drivers will usually slide more toward the end of the race. The Easiest solution I could think of was success ballast.
-
-
-
-
What makes you think I have superstitions?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Princess Bexter’s Bio
Growing my chewbacca out.
