Ask me anything!

RSS Feed
  1. All responses Most smiled responses
    1. Marylin Houle
    2. Marylin Houle
    3. Marylin Houle
    4. Marylin Houle
    5. Marylin Houle

      Well, because females are here in order to procreate and by the time they hit their 30's, I believe, their hormones do crazy things and make them wanna have children before their eggs shrivel up or whatever they do.

      Although we know that not all women make use of their reproductive system, perhaps those in the pornography business would rather keep their sexy girls under the age of motherhood and reserve those over 30 to be the token MILFs.

    6. Marylin Houle
    7. Marylin Houle
    8. Marylin Houle
    9. Marylin Houle
    10. Marylin Houle
    11. Marylin Houle

      Well, there is a good chance that a microscopic hair or something equally as gross got lodged around and/or inside the thing-a-ma-bob that senses motion and whatnot. My advice is to 'blow baby, blow.' But if you find the problem is likely elsewhere, make sure the driver is recognizing the gad-damn usb because if it's not, you might as well walk your ass down to the Office Depot and buy yourself a fancy new mouse.

      I think NaNoWriMo is effecting my ability to be concise. Riley I'm scared!!!

    12. Marylin Houle

      In response:

      I was more apathetic before I realized there was more going on then I was led to beleive. The more knowledge I gain, the less apathetic I grow. I do not for a minute beleive nothing can be done to "fix" things and I'm among the majority as far as I've seen.

      As for damaging our species, I wish I knew how to make my point succinctly but you'll have to settle for this for now: Any conspiracy theory that does not give me sound reason (academically, scientifically, just plain realistically) to beleive it, I don't. I'm sure you'll disagree.

      You said "This knowledge is founded upon certain academic and scientific standards." My problem with that is you are defending collective knowledge that was founded upon "CERTAIN ACADEMIC AND SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS." What academic and scientific standards? Whose standards did we follow? Doesn't knowledge and science become pointless if we dismiss everything that does not fit into a certain box? If questions are no longer allowed to be asked unless they fall into the reasoning of this standard then we are simply closing off the possibilities. Without the ability to collect and analyze further data, where does that leave science? Where does that leave us but stuck in this rigid box just because a certain standard has been laid out for us. Things that were considered preposterous in the past that would get a man put away for being a nut job are now common place. Did we stop evolving and learning?

      I would love for us to switch places for a day so that I could see it from your point of view and you from mine. I'd also love for more people to actually research, in depth, some of these theories and then explain to me why it still does not add up for them.

      Okay I've ranted too long, sorry. I go write now lol.

    13. Marylin Houle

      I propose you do a bit of research on certain family lines and those in service to them: Rothschilds, Rockerfellers, Bushes, Bundys, etc. Look into Skull and Bones opium trade with China and the founding of the CIA. Just a little something to chew on if you're open to it.

    14. Marylin Houle

      Re-assembling whatever grasp I still have of my sanity... or you could also call it 'making sure S.A.D. does not eat me alive.'

      It's been relatively unexciting lately - I feel like I've been hiding out a bit.

      The most exciting thing going on right now, I suppose, is the upcoming NaNoWriMo contest (http://www.nanowrimo.org/eng/user/533398).

      Yeah.

    15. Marylin Houle

      Reality is everything. To human beings, reality is what is perceived: if we do not know it exists, it is not real. This is ignorance. That is why I say, reality is everything. A better question then, would be, what makes something NOT real? I'm of the concept that there is no such thing. Just as there is no such thing as nothing, there is also no such thing as not real. If it's not real, then it's fake, and if it's fake, then what is it doing existing? And if it doesn't exist, it is nothing, and there is no such thing as nothing.

      Yet! There are no such thing as absolutes... so either there are exceptions to every rule, or this whole thing remains a mystery.

    16. Marylin Houle

      In response to: http://www.formspring.me/superchicken46/q/1406904442

      Following this line of thinking, I refer you back to your response regarding the mindset of the elite being quite different than yours and mine: IF you have the wealth, the power, and the opportunity/position to have a strong influence on the direction you would like society to take, and you, like so many of your peers, beleive that direction needs to be toward a specific outcome (utopia of sorts), would you not think quite differently than if you were an average joe blow who, even if you had a vision of perfection, knew you could not do much about it because of your status in the world? Would you not develop a sort of "God complex"? Most human beings do not have such a state of mind.

      Let's go back thousands of years, politically, to when, as one example, those in the highest seats of power believed themselves to be sons and daughters of the gods. How much more of a God complex can you get? Now coming back to present day, are you aware that many of those in power still beleive they are of divine lineage? And these same people have a vision of the world too... like you said, metaphysics in the wrong hands can be dangerous.

      But like I said, there ARE many people who help govern our world who do not think the way we think, do not have our interests in mind, only whatever measures they think need to be taken to get society further and further toward their own vision of perfection.

    17. Marylin Houle
    18. Marylin Houle
    19. Marylin Houle
    20. Marylin Houle

      I always think of 'classic' as something that stands the test of time... timelessness... often something relatively older but not necessarily. Not sure if that is the correct meaning though.

friends
smiles
3 all-time

Marylin Houle’s Bio

Come on, let's have some fun :o) No such thing as a stupid question. Make me think!

Advertisement

Who Marylin Houle responded to

  • Riley Haas
  • Blake
  • tam
  • Trixie Kiss
See all »

Who is following Marylin Houle

  • Rugg Ruggedo
See all »